the grayzone reliable
The story Max published however, was penned by an author who doesn’t even exist, as exposed in a 2018 report by Charles Davis at the Daily Beast. Write on Medium, This is what media innovators are doing in 2019, How Complex Media became one of the most innovative digital publishers, Mainstream Media Are in Big Trouble, and They Know It, The digitization of politics, violence, hate and the rise of the “Digital-Industrial-Complex”, Why canceling college sports may hurt local news in an unexpected way, How The Media Became a Tool of Disengagement, Netflix Won’t Share Crucial Data, So TV Producers Are Piecing It Together Themselves, 1: These fanatics are often referred to by their detractors as “tankies”, an explanation on why they are called that and the history of the term can be found. These editors not only manipulate and monopolize the globe’s easy access to information; they have even led campaigns to delete the Wikipedia articles of numerous left-wing journalists and media figures. But The Grayzone is not the only independent news website that has been censored by this gang of regime-change enthusiasts. Such opponents included the White Helmets, Syrian children who suffered gas attacks and were accused of faking it … And it is run by figures who often represent these same elite interests, or align with their regime-change politics. These actions, which seek to gain advantage without provoking a conventional military response, are often difficult for free-market democracies to counter. He has made many thousands of edits, and obsessively monitors the website, making multiple changes on an almost daily basis. Twitter says this is to help keep the platform a place for reliable information. These electronic minions of misinformation spread the exaggerations, denials and half-truths they receive from their grifter masters with evangelical zeal, and an apparent imperviousness to facts or reality ¹. Rosguill stated outright that The Grayzone is “less than reliable.” Why? The result was a firestorm of ad hominem attacks and bad-faith smears from advocates of Western intervention. Users also reported a second prompt when they attempted to ‘like’ the story, again sternly warning of potential ‘hacking’ while urging them to “help keep Twitter a place for reliable info. In fact the survey’s own moderator, ZiaLater, reluctantly admitted their political bias in the comments. Some editors describe The Grayzone as Max Blumenthal’s blog, and question the website’s editorial oversight.”. Together, this tiny handful of editors has successfully banned Wikipedia from citing The Grayzone, falsely claiming that the website publishes unreliable, false, or fabricated information. Jamez42 states clearly on their profile that they are Venezuelan, and, once again, the user edits Wikipedia for hours per day, every day, always pushing the line of US-backed, anti-Chavista politicians. He also had a new media sponsor and an “Anti-Imperial” axe to grind. In fact, the New York Times admitted in 2000 that the US Agency for International Development (USAID), National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and International Republican Institute all poured millions of dollars into support for Otpor – an undeniable fact that is ironically also noted on Wikipedia’s own article on Otpor. This article was produced independently with no financial assistance from anyone with the motive of improving journalistic integrity and combating misinformation. According to Wikipedia, The Grayzone, an investigative journalism website founded by an award-winning journalist, is as unreliable as these other extremist media outlets. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. “Neutrality” also has shown a disproportionate fixation on demonizing the Venezuelan and Russian governments, writing large parts of Wikipedia’s article on “democratic backsliding” to demonize Presidents Maduro and Vladimir Putin specifically. GrayZone, Inc. was founded in 1995 by … The cast of editors seeking to censor The Grayzone runs the gamut from Russiagate conspiracy theorists to anarcho-neocons to regime-change lobbyists to elite Venezuelan opposition members – basically anyone threatened by journalism that challenges the Washington consensus. Prominent editors and admins, who have special privileges not afforded to average users, debate what sources are considered legitimate on the encyclopedia. So Wikipedia is anything but the democratic and decentralized marketplace of ideas and information it advertises itself as. The fact that the vast majority of edits on Wikipedia are performed by a tiny fraction of users makes it easy for small groups with time and resources to push political bias on the website. The user’s post kicked off a fiery debate, with dozens of comments from a Who’s Who of Venezuelan opposition supporters and pro-Western government interventionists. While these Wikipedia editors claimed to be concerned about “false or fabricated information” – the stated reason for blacklisting The Grayzone – they were actually censoring the website because it told too many inconvenient truths. These are the news outlets that editors are allowed to cite in an article. This all-caps charge against responsible journalism … The Grayzone, formerly called The Grayzone Project, was founded by Max Blumenthal. You can’t imagine the feeling of powerless,” one immigrant told me a few days after Blumenthal’s Potemkin Village video variety show, which included mocking employees at a mall in terrible Spanish — employees who at the time most likely worked for $7 a month. (The monthly minimum wage has since slipped to $3). My experience lies more in how they have misrepresented Latin America — which they have done with vigor. Did NY Times Violate Its Own Ethics Code to Feature Child of Venezuelan Coup Plotter? Grayzone ran a story on the event, stating the killings at the University were a hoax, a claim Max would repeat in various interviews while in Nicaragua. This figure also initiated and moderated the surveys to successfully blacklist TeleSUR and Venezuelanalysis, among the few news sources that challenge the hegemonic anti-Chavista perspective furthered by Western mainstream media. Wikipedia is the most perfectly corrupt neoliberal encyclopedia imaginable. Some right-wing websites, such as The Blaze, the Daily Wire, and Quillette have been hit by this designation as well, along with the libertarian website Zero Hedge. That’s hard to say. The Weekly Standard, which was run by Bill Kristol, the godfather of American neoconservatism, printed numerous lies and demonstrably false stories in the lead-up to the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, trying to make the case for the war on behalf of the George W. Bush administration. If you wish to support more independent work like this series in the future you can donate here. Will the Senate scrutinize Biden budget nominee Neera Tanden’s apparent pay-for-play foreign policy corruption. There is no independent oversight of this process. It just so happens that they became pro-Assad after attending a Moscow luxury Gala; the same event that got Jill Stein and Trump appointment Michael Flynn (who was paid $40,000 for attending) in hot water. Max Blumenthal said something back when he opposed war crimes in 2013 that resonated with me. The Grayzone is an entirely independent website that does not work with any state media outlet and does not receive funding from any government institutions. ... Apart from The Grayzone story, the “hacking materials” label has also been seen on a story regarding Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, which was posted on January 16, and a tweet with a music video fo English singer Rick Astley, shared on February 24. But in reality, the guidelines are hollow ideals that are scarcely, if ever, enforced – particularly when leftist and anti-imperialist media figures are under attack. Joining the campaign was Jamez42, another explicit advocate for Venezuela’s right-wing opposition. A glance at ReyHahn’s edits showed the user obsessively editing Venezuela-related pages on Wikipedia nearly every single day, for hours per day. AlterNet used to host The Grayzone Project, a space for the Kremlin-linked Assadist Max Blumenthal and his protege Ben Norton to express their admiration for the lion of Damascus, and attack any perceived opponents of the Syrian regime by branding them radical Islamists. “All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic,” the principle states. ZiaLater contributed the most to the discussion. One in which they framed a fiercely violent government oppression of protests that killed hundreds, and injured thousands , as a justified response. Others include leftist and anti-imperialist outlets like MintPress News and the Latin American news broadcaster Telesur, along with several prominent right-wing political sites, including the Daily Caller. At the same time, Wikipedia has given the interventionist pro-NATO blog Bellingcat a green light as a credible … The vast majority of the users who chimed in in the official Wikipedia survey and argued in support of blacklisting The Grayzone have shown clear political bias in their editing. But ZiaLater downplayed the importance of this point and quickly changed the subject. According to Wikipedia, The Grayzone, an investigative journalism website founded by an award-winning journalist, is as unreliable as these other extremist media outlets. Under the alias BobfromBrockley, Gidley maintains a blog in which he advances an anarcho-neoconservative ideology, obsessively attacking left-wing anti-war journalists and scholars as “Stalinists” while aggressively supporting Western regime-change efforts in China, Russia, Syria, Libya, and beyond. This survey was closely overseen by the Wikipedia editor ZiaLater, who in the past revealed on their user page that they are Venezuelan. But Syria isn’t my area of expertise. And the problem has only gotten worse since. “You don’t know what it’s like to work all day only be to able to afford a few tomatoes and some lettuce, to make a little salad. Neoliberal trolls successfully got my Wikipedia page deleted. In the Wikipedia pile-on, BobfromBrockley claimed there were “several factual errors” on The Grayzone, but he did not cite a single example. BobfromBrockley has been identified as Ben Gidley, a British academic who openly supports NATO and pushes an liberal Zionist ideology, smearing leftist anti-imperialists, including many supporters of former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, as anti-Semites. 826 talking about this. This lone user spends hours per day, virtually every of the week, obsessively monitoring and editing articles to smear anti-war journalists and politicians.
Michelle Obama Academy Awards, The Hula Hoop Song, Finding Audrey What Happened To Her, Citi C13 Salary, Escape Room Kl, Supplements For Bruxism, Traverse City Coffee, Country Handbags Australia, The Buffalo Are Back Comprehension, Peace Bethel Music Instrumental, Watford - Rotherham Prediction,